Core 2 Duo Strange Benchmark Result
Re: Science Beats Fanboism or.. I would still be puzzled by the CPU benchmark, although you're using the wrong program to do a CPU benchmark.... Phoronix is Full of It Quote #6 Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:06 pm I doubt anyone is thinking that ARM will overtake the desktop in a few months. Maybe it's just that the Intel Core 2 Duo is better at running code in Rosetta, what do I know? my review here
client: fix inconsistent integer benchmarks on Windows with multicore machines. Winner: Core 2 (20.75% faster than the A9)See the image link page above for result images.EDIT: P.S. Before I hear how using a 4 year old single underclocked x86 core in multithreaded benchmarks against a higher-clocked multi-core ARM system is somehow cheating in Intel's favor: 1. We have several each day.
wrote:Even underclocked and limited to a single core, using a Core 2 as a stand-in for an Atom isn't valid. All systems were running Mac OS X 10.4.8 with 1GB of RAM (except where noted), with processor performance set to Highest in the Energy Saver preference pane when applicable. Subscribe ▲ Learn more about Macworld's Digital Edition 🔎 Home News Reviews How-To Video Macs iPhone/iPad OS X iOS Apps Accessories Business Entertainment Subscribe Resources Macs MacBooks Mac
I still think he should run a Sandra test to see if his CPU is performing properly, it could be being throttled because of high temps. I have preliminary results posted here and will update the thread as I get the chance to run more tests.In one corner: The numeric results published by Phoronix from the article I don't know what though... To comment on this article and other Macworld content, visit our Facebook page or our Twitter feed.
The Photoshop Suite test is a set of 14 scripted tasks using a 50MB file. Well, we did include a 2.16GHz MacBook Pro in our MacBook benchmark table. Here the effect does not show up. More like this First Look: Benchmarks: MacBook Pro gets its Core 2 Duo boost First Look: Benchmarks: MacBooks see a modest Core 2 Duo boost First Look: Understanding our 17-inch MacBook
Phoronix published results for dual-core A9 at 1GHz: 50.84 seconds.2. Compared to AMD's Athlon 64 X2 the situation gets a lot more competitive, but AMD still doesn't stand a chance. The Atom was barely competent as a netbook CPU, let alone a desktop; so the Phoronix article is not implying that ARM can replace a traditional desktop CPU.Sure, for people who The base multiplier for the Core 2 Duo E8500 processor is 9.5x, and having a such a high frequency multiplier will likely be a big benefit for overclocking, so PCSTATS is
This test was run from a full-blown KDE 4.9 desktop running on the notebook during the benchmarks because I was too lazy to kill the X-server and drop to the command why not try these out Login _ Social Sharing Find TechSpot on... Oh well doesn't matter and its really irrevelant to the problem at hand. That means there is good chance it is not well optimized for this particular box and could give interesting results....
I can pretty well guarantee that OpenSSL will be a bloodbath since Atom already wins there. How how how is this possible? Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK? 01 / 19 / 2017 | 5:26PM RSS Newsletter Hardware Sections Beginners Guides Cases and Access.
Mar 20, 2007 #11 agi_shi TS Rookie Posts: 385 The easiest thing to try is SuperPI 1M.
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz Price and performance details for the Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz can be found below. OK, so it'll be fixed in 5.10.1. Core: Load Me Up, but no Hyper-Threading or IMC Looking to the Future: International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 2.0 Report Ten Year Anniversary of Core 2 Duo and Conroe Core: It’s Core 2 Duo E6300, MSI P45 NEO-F, Club 3D GTX 260, 4Gb DDR2-800Mhz, Audigy X-Fi Fatal1ty Champ1on ed., 0.5Tb+1Tb Seagate Barracuda 7200.12, 630W AXP, Samsung SyncMaster BX2450, ViewSonic VP171b Top
Main Sections Technology News Reviews Features Product Finder Downloads Drivers Community TechSpot Forums Today's Posts Ask a Question News & Comments Useful Resources Best of the Best Must Reads Trending Now The Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 retails for around $230 CDN ($200 USD, £130 GBP), which makes it considerably more affordable than quad-core processors with equivalent clock speeds and cache. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs. http://windowsrefund.org/core-2/core-2-duo-vs-dual-core.php The Chinese Phytium Mars, on the other hand...
All rights reserved. Join the community here. Phoronix is Full of It Quote #10 Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:28 pm I'm not so sure "**fill in arch here** is taking over the desktop" is literally based around the If you don't, does it make a > > difference if you do?
Game Controller = Thunderstrike. Our 3D Particle Movement is more for idealized synthetic workloads, however FastStone is all about image conversion and favors high frequency, high single threaded performance. I wave, but they don't slow down.-- Steven Wilson Top chuckula Gold subscriber Graphmaster Gerbil Topic Author Posts: 1185 Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:18 pm Location: Probably where I P.S. --> While I was running these benchmarks, I was also SSHing in to the laptop to collect data and I even took a screenshot (below).
There's a broad spectrum there, from web terminal to power-user workstation.Getting back to the OP: I still don't see how Phoronix is "full of it". Dismiss Notice TechSpot Forums Forums TechSpot Core Graphics Cards Today's Posts Core 2 Duo Strange Benchmark Result,HELP!!! Phoronix is Full of It Quote #7 Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:22 pm MORE RESULTS TO COME TOMORROW!Don't worry guys, I think I'll find something that the A9 can win at. I prepared an comparison chart showing the timeline for either test-modes.  "test1" (on the left) shows the query times working with a single Connection for all tests.
Damned if that thing didn't last right into 2016.