Home > Ati Radeon > ATI Radeon 9800 XT Or Geforce FX 5950 Ultra?

ATI Radeon 9800 XT Or Geforce FX 5950 Ultra?

Click here to close this message Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. All rights reserved. @Home Article Database Editorials BIOS Opt. As ISS said, the newer nVidia chipsets have been seriously flawed. The RADEON 9800XT was tested with CATALYST 3.9 drivers while the GeForce FX used NVIDIA's ForceWare 52.16 drivers.John Gillooly AestheticismsThe 9800XT is one of the weightier cards ATI have released - http://windowsrefund.org/ati-radeon/ati-radeon-9800xt-vs-geforce-6800-vs-geforce-6600gt.php

I personally have conducted many top-of-the-line video card analyses, benchmarks and tests; throughout my time, I have acquired a sufficient amount of onboard GPU-cooling technology - and we can tell you I had one in a custom Hypersonic PC and the 9700 Pro sucked so bad that I sold the whole machine. The Radeon did have an impressive feature set but their strengths were the quality on their polygon edges and the raw performance, specifically anti-aliasing and filtering combined. so if you want to play doom 3 more than hl2, get the 5950 ultra Jan 14, 2004 #9 somekid007 TS Rookie Posts: 271 http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDc0 heres the link incase you

it will probably be NV40 before Nvidia fixes this. Of course, if all I cared about was performance, then the FX5900 ultra would not have satisfied me. Both are equipped with 256MB of onboard RAM and are backed by ASUS's award-winning GPU-cooling technology.

AMD Radeon Pro WX Series Workstation... Reproduction in whole or in part, in any form or medium, without express written permission of HotHardware.com, LLC. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.Got an opinion on this content? This is one of the first instances we've seen a GeForce card beat a RADEON by so much using a decent amount of filtering.

They thought>4x2 would be good enough...then ati came on the market with..a pure>8x1 solution!But important thing to remeber, don't BUY either of these unless theyare under $250, as the new cards Over the months, NVIDIA has slowly been creeping closer to the insane performance of the RADEON 9800 PROs, but never enough to fully squish and defeat them. in Pixelshader actions the R3x0 series of ati arefaster due to.. http://www.techspot.com/community/topics/ati-radeon-9800-xt-or-geforce-fx-5950-ultra.10221/ It also didn't have the wbuffer or the 2x RGSS AA mode that the Geforce FX had.

It stole sides from both theoretical and gaming tests. Disclaimer As a member of Team ARP, I'm obligated to report the actual benchmark results that I achieved. Support Us! Jan 14, 2004 #8 somekid007 TS Rookie Posts: 271 preliminary tests show that fx cards are wayyyyyy ahead in doom 3 benchies.

Similar Threads - Geforce Ultra 9800XT Forum Date How does a Geforce 6800 Ultra handle today's games? Ask ! It has aged and is now onl Related Articles Nvidia releases GeForce Hot Fix driver version 376.60 New GeForce 375.86 WHQL drivers out now Sapphire reveals Nitro and vanilla RX 460 Articles ARP Forums!

First, I think you know as well as I do that the Radeon 9800XT would simply blow my card out of the water. http://windowsrefund.org/ati-radeon/ati-radeon-9800-pro-problems.php with>very different workings...>>And in directx games the 9800XT is generally known to be faster>The poor FX series also has the problem that in many games it uses>it's own codepath wich is At the time of writing, release 340 had just been pushed to the public and this one keeps NVIDIA's 52.16 Forceware (the drivers are no longer known as Detonators) at bay The tests were run using Windows XP with SP1 and DirectX 9.0b.

There finally appeared really worthy games capable of using the power of the newest graphics processors. Of course the Engineering and Marketing teams at ATi had full knowledge of NVIDIA's impending launch at the time and began readying their 256MB variant of the Radeon 9800 Pro. At first, I wanted to see how well it would do against the Radeon 9800XT. weblink Support Us!

if you decreased the color depth from 32 to 24bit or something like that, performance improved to acceptable levels?Click to expand... Because of the advantages of reduction in both the heat and noise, it would seem this copper design should be used more often on video cards. Articles ARP Forums!

You may also...

Please click on the link in the email to verify your email address. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > Anarchist420 Diamond Member Joined: Feb 13, 2010 Messages: 8,649 Likes Received: 0 I think the Geforce FX was way better even though it But I'll bet you are still hungering for more performance comparisons! All rights reserved.

Email* * Email address required * Invalid Email address I have read and accept the privacy policy and terms and conditions and by submitting my email address I agree to receive First, I think you know as well as I do that the Radeon 9800XT would simply blow my card out of the water. The 9800XT was so quiet it's hard not to be fooled into thinking it uses passive cooling - it barely ever went above its slowest speed even when under full load. check over here It took over a month from ATI's announcement of the RADEON 9800XT for cards to enter Australia, and it has been even longer for the mid-range 9600XT.

Better?>>Well depends... In OpenGLthough nvidia wins....There is no better here...you talk about two different GPU's ... Then the GFFX5900 Ultra pulls ahead by a healthy margin, with its higher over all memory bandwidth most likely giving it the edge. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Licensing Advertise International Editions: US / UK India Articles & News Forum Graphics & Displays CPU Components Motherboards Games Storage Overclocking Tutorials All categories Chart

In OpenGL>though nvidia wins....>>There is no better here...you talk about two different GPU's ... Intel SSD DC P3520 Series NVMe PCIe... Downloads Area About Us Accolades Our Server! I'll start: It's a total waste people. 512mb is unnecessary.

Facebook Twitter Google Close Enter your username and e-mail address. Also, in Half-Life 2, VALVe stated that nvidia cards will get degraded quality because they don't have the full DX9 feature set like ATI cards do. It does not represent the current situation and is both misleading and inaccurate. Latest Money Savers!

Unfortunately, 2 years later the HSF was clogged with dust, the card overheated, and couldn't be used without graphical artifacts. Which, might we mention again, is really frucking stupid of NVIDIA. ASUS has not only made this trademark blindly apparent, but they've incorporated their technology in such a way that truly encompasses the meaning of unique manufacturing. Throughout this article we plan to Deadlines were looming and although it would have been possible in theory, to be able to include this new entrant from ATi, sleep deprivation took hold of our team and a

Modded Radeon 9800SE Vs. Next Page : The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra, The Soft-Modded Radeon 9800SE >>> Quick Link Menu 1 - Introduction2 - The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra, ...3 - Objectives, Testing Methodo...4 Nvidia fans can say what they like, but there's no denying that the ATI cards are already ready for the DX9 games. D: #23 TakeNoPrisoners, Nov 30, 2011 Anarchist420 Diamond Member Joined: Feb 13, 2010 Messages: 8,649 Likes Received: 0 fralexandr said: ↑ i thought the main reason the fx couldn't handle

Frankly we're a little uncertain with respect to validity of this suite of benchmarks, as rumors and accusations fly in the media of NVIDIA's alleged "optimizations" (or cheating depending on who I got the monarch system mentioned above with a Geforce FX 5900 Ultra a year later and it was a lot better than the R300 I had for 4 months until,

© Copyright 2017 windowsrefund.org. All rights reserved.