Home > Athlon Xp > Athlon XP Gets 166MHz FSB

Athlon XP Gets 166MHz FSB

That is why the implementation of faster 333MHz bus will require some extra tests to be carried out, and maybe even a complete layout redesign. In standard VIA KT333 mode, however, that is when the FSB frequency is 133MHz, the use of faster DDR333 memory instead of DDR266 hardly tells on the performance. Just now I rebooted with FSB 166, and again saw the AMD Athlon XP 2800 at top of the post screen as I hit pause break,,,, then the machine power crashed It differs from the previous benchmarks set dating back to 2001 only by the versions of the included applications. his comment is here

Model Number Frequency L2 Cache FSB Multiplier Voltage Release Date Part Number Athlon XP-M 2000+ 1667MHz 256 KB 266 MT/s 12.5x 1.60 March 12, 2003 AXMA2000FUT3C Athlon XP-M 2200+ 1800MHz 256 While a move to 400MHz bus speed sounds good and all, the only chipset on the market that currently supports this nVIDIA's nForce2. Tell us what you think of this new feature - FEEDBACK? 01 / 19 / 2017 | 2:04PM RSS Newsletter Hardware Sections Beginners Guides Cases and Access. Please read Asus A7V133 + Athlon XP? http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlonxp-166.html

Logged Fredrik GENERAL OF THE ARMY Offline Posts: 16126 There's always a risk. « Reply #1 on: 08-December-06, 19:10:44 » The following error or errors occurred while this message: Best Answer found here: •http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=362&kind=1• On a different page than the 2 versions mentioned above. Model Number Frequency L2-Cache FSB Multiplier Voltage TDP (Core) Release Date Part Number Athlon XP 1600+ 1400MHz 256 KB 266 MT/s 10.5x 1.60 V 48.5 W (B) AXDA1600DUT3C Athlon XP 1700+

of 12.5 and it is running at 166MHz FSB so I got 12.5*166=2075MHz but remember this only gives you an idea that the closest frequency as it may not be the runs at full potential.Exterior HDD and Burner beyond the scope here and not attached.O/S Win. First though, I'm going to be a bit of a spoiler and ruin the suspense; overall system performance at 400MHz bus speeds is better than that at 333MHz bus speeds - All in all, we could recommend only two products out of four VIA KT333 based mainboards tested recently (see our article called: "5 Socket A Mainboards Supporting DDR333 on VIA KT333

Ask a new question Read More CPUs Bus Windows XP Related Resources AV7133 @133 CPU BUS? De tekst is beschikbaar onder de licentie Creative Commons Naamsvermelding/Gelijk delen, er kunnen aanvullende voorwaarden van toepassing zijn. The faster system bus in case the memory frequency remains the same provides a certain effect on the performance during write and copy operations, although this effect is not that big. http://www.techspot.com/community/topics/athlon-xp-gets-166mhz-fsb-2700-and-2800-announced.2789/ because it's a killing machine...

More resources See also Athlon xp+ pc133 sdram good? However, when you increase both: the FSB and memory frequency from 133MHz up to 166MHz, WinRAR algorithm will start working 16% faster.We can't call mp3 encoding an operation depending too much Presently running BIOS: A6712 V. 1B*As seen on face of MoBo: KT4V MS-6712 Ver:10A*The Original Box bar code label: KT4V-L (601-6712-050)K7, KT400. 5.1 chnl. With this upcoming FSB change on the horizon for AMD, many consumers will soon confront the eternal "should I buy now or wait" question.

because it's a killing machine... I'm trying not to think of Intel as the enemy, but I can't help it... http://www.msicomputer.com/support/bios_result.asp• No wonder people are frustrated and confused about different MoBo versions there ID #’s and the BIOS versions them selves as seen on this news board. During this period I checked Windows Task Manager > Performance, CPU usage at 100%, PF usage 1.35gb.

FSB Bus Speed 100MHz 200MHz 133MHz 266MHz 166MHZ 333MHz 200MHz 400MHz If you'll recall from past PCstats.com articles, the Front Side Bus (FSB) is the bus within a processor that connects this content When we switch from 133MHz FSB to 166MHz FSB (with DDR333 memory used) the performance gain makes 7%-15%. We tried to see how greatly the Athlon XP performance grew due to the use of faster system bus. Oh, and get rid of AOL.

AXDA2800DKV3D Athlon XP 2800+ 2083 MHz 512 kB 2x 166 MHz 12,5x 1,65 V Barton Core AXDA2800DKV4D Athlon XP 3000+ 2167 MHz 512 kB 2x 166 MHz 13x 1,65 V Barton Should always be done when changing processor, and I've noticed on the Internet there are a few 1,5V XP2800 around.http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:Q4eIa6OhudcJ:forums.amd.com/lofiversion/index.php/t47487.html+AXDL2800DLV4D+problem&hl=sv&gl=se&ct=clnk&cd=1 Logged Print Pages: [1] Go Up « previous next » MSI Forums > Chips > AMD ATHLON XP 2000 at 166MHz FSB "AMD ATHLON XP 2000 at 166MHz FSB" Started 6/15/2007 by Michael Driscoll in Chips Forum (3 posts) http://windowsrefund.org/athlon-xp/athlon-xp-2600.php For example, the recently announced DDR333 chipset from VIA aka KT333 does support 166MHz FSB, although no specs sheet declares that.

The sticker points to nearly half of the boards above except for the MS-6712 and the Ver:10a which is what I based my BIOS choices on. As we have seen in the past with the Intel Celeron line of processors, a low FSB can severely limit the overall system performance of a processor regardless of what the TechSpot is a registered trademark.

Login Register 19-January-17, 19:02:01 Welcome, Guest Please login or register.

While AMD just recently increased the AthlonXP bus speed from 266MHz to 333MHz in October 2002, there has been a lot of talk lately about the AthlonXP moving to a 400MHz pity I'm going to run with my new 2100+ @ 140fsb (1820 Mhz) for a while as I would be tempted to try out the 333fsb running with some 333 memory Barton core) are running on 166MHz bus.My PC has gone to hell... Please disregard the reported voltage, CPU-Z does not read that properly Aside from the higher performance a 400MHz bus speed would bring to the table for the AMD AthlonXP, it should

Now that we have that out of the way, let's discuss some of the pro's and con's of moving to a higher FSB. v t e AMD processors List of AMD microprocessors Discontinued pre-x86 Am9080 Am2900 list Am29000 Berkeley RISC Alchemy MIPS32 Early x86 (16-bit) Am286 IA-32 (32-bit) Am386 Am486 Am5x86 K5 K6 K6-2 Well, enough of talking, let's pass over to some practice.Testbed and MethodsThis test session was aimed at finding out if the use of 333MHz processor bus is justified for Athlon XP check over here Thanks for the link, DB.

However, it is exactly this particular case (166MHz FSB and DDR333 memory) that arouses most interest by experiment-lovers.Here it should be also mentioned that setting 166MHz FSB frequency is no big of the CPU then you can calculate the clock frequency e.g. before going blank) Manual power down. Moreover, the announcement of the ClawHammer baby positioned as a performance solution will oust Athlon XP to the value market now occupied by Duron and Celeron CPUs.

Ask a question and give support. Moreover, increasing the system bus frequency seems to be a more evident means of raising the performance of an Athlon based system than even the increase in the L2 cache size. The Inquirer reports that the Athlon 3200+ FSB333 AXDA3200KV4D processor was used in the Hewlett Packard d325 business desktop computer (link). ^ a b c d Was released with very limited

© Copyright 2017 windowsrefund.org. All rights reserved.