AMD Athlon Xp3200+ Or Intel 3ghz
You may also... If it burns out then I'm completely screwed Feb 22, 2004 #19 somekid007 TS Rookie Posts: 271 if you must go for athlon xp, get an nforce2 mobo and ditch AMD zielt mit dem Athlon XP 3200+ klar auf das derzeitige Spitzenmodell von Intel - den Pentium 4 mit 3 GHz. In August 1999, AMD released the Athlon (K7) processor. http://windowsrefund.org/amd-athlon/amd-athlon-1-3ghz.php
Everything else was won by... While the addition of more layers itself does not improve performance, it gives more flexibility for chip designers routing electrical pathways within a chip, and importantly for the Thoroughbred core, more It's the long anticipated VIA Apollo KT600 chipset. bus Clock speed 800 MHz 400 MHz details Pentium 4 630 vs Athlon XP 3000+ Threads 2 1 L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 my review here
Pentium 4 is clearly better, but the difference is not that considerable to shout about. For the sports magazine, see Athlon Sports. And though it may seem strange, it's not only about the aforementioned long pipeline and other known Pentium 4 disadvantages. I will go for the xp 3200+, seeing as I will be running it on 512mb ram and soon a relatively decent gfx.
Let's get to the results right away. So, we can say that VIA KT400A is completely identical to KT400 (oh yeah it's faster... This technology was marketed as "PowerNow!" and was similar to Intel's SpeedStep power saving technique. Operating system software, drivers and even optimized applications have yet to surface, thus, it's extremely difficult for anyone to even begin computing in 64-bits.
AMD later renamed the technology to Cool'n'Quiet on their K8-based CPUs (Athlon 64, etc.), and introduced it for use on desktop PCs as well. Actually, it works out to about 3.1 MHZ for> this Athlon and AMD processors are better at Graphics than Intel.">> I have had PC's with both Intel and AMD processors in These users would likely be the ones that would hang dearly to their trusted 32-bit software for the next couple of years. AMD's older CPUs could simply be set to run at whatever clock speed the user chose on the motherboard, making it trivial to relabel a CPU and sell it as a
Undervolting is a process of determining the lowest voltage at which a CPU can remain stable at a given clock speed. As we still pretend we don't know the next results to make things more interesting, this chipset unpleasantly surprises us. Vladimir Ribnikov ([email protected]) Dmitry Mayorov ([email protected]) Write a comment below. In order to reach the same bandwidth levels, the AthlonXP's bus would have to be clocked at levels simply unreachable. By this point, the four-year-old Athlon EV6 bus architecture had scaled
AMD thus reworked the Thoroughbred's design to better match the process node on which it was produced, in turn creating the Thoroughbred-B. browse this site Even though AMD is preparing to launch the Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 FX in just more than a week's time, we thought it would be the best time to take In fact, some I had long forgottenwhich they had in them unless I was asked.SO, I took the salesperson's word as above and decided to save somemoney and get the HP blog comments powered by Disqus Most Popular Reviews More RSS AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330
Indeed, the 64-bit computing world is an exciting one but it's also filled with lots of uncertainties. his comment is here Note heat sink and cooling fan assembly on rear side. In the announcement, Sanders referred to the partnership as creating a "virtual gorilla" that would enable AMD to compete with Intel on fabrication capacity while limiting AMD's financial outlay for new Archived from the original on September 28, 2007. ^ AMD Announces First Revenue Shipments From Dresden "MEGAFAB", AMD Press Release, June 5, 2000, retrieved January 6, 2012 ^ a b c
And now, may you excuse us for an indelicate question: doesn't this endless KT400 modification bother you? Feb 22, 2004 #22 jet_black636 TS Rookie LNCPapa said: You can't go simply by clock speed - you'll probably get very similary performance from both of these processors. Wer sich für die echte Taktrate interessiert - 2200 MHz sind eher von zweitrangiger Bedeutung. this contact form Especially, we have another "hero" to be tested today.
It used the same, commonly available, physical 242 pin connector used by Intel Slot 1 processors but rotated by 180 degrees to connect the processor to the motherboard. However, the downside tothis was that their per-clock performance is relatively weak, a lot ofinstructions take a long time to execute, there are lots of potentialsfor the pipeline to stall, small The K7 design team was led by Dirk Meyer, who had worked as a lead engineer at DEC on multiple Alpha microprocessors during his employment at DEC.
Some Barton core Athlon XP-Ms have been successfully overclocked as high as 3.1GHz.
January 30, 2013·Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1An external X-Fi solution in tests. Pentium 4 has been winning in 3ds max since version 4.26, and so it continues today. AnonymousNov 9, 2004, 4:04 AM Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 19:26:36 -0800, Ryan wrote:> Can someone give me a clear comparison? Maybe I screwed up.>>While I am happy with this new machine, the "system" area of Windows>XP claims the processor speed on this machine is 2.2 MHZ.>>Can someone give me a clear
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. LAN VIA MAC 10/100 Mbit Ethernet VIA MAC 10/100 Mbit Ethernet VIA MAC 10/100 Mbit Ethernet PCI slots 6 6 6 IDE - 2 Serial ATA channels for 2 SATA devices The PR also became somewhat inaccurate because some Barton models with lower clock rates were being given higher PR than higher-clocked Thoroughbred processors. navigate here The relative performance level is then reliant upon the actualsoftware tasks that the chips are being asked to run.
Thanks! On the other hand, Intel's quad-pumped bus boosts the bandwidth further to 800MHz. But they would still be pretty close, youprobably wouldn't be able to 'feel' it.And XP is correct too. The Athlon's exclusive-cache architecture and shorter pipeline made it less sensitive to L2 cache size, and the Barton only saw an increase of several percent gained in per-clock performance over the
But let's now get back to the results: nothing surprising, we must admit.